People search for what you sell. They find everyone but you.

No, and the distinction matters. We are a technology consultancy: we work out how a business should run and then build it. Search and AI visibility is one of the things we build into what we ship. We do not sell link packages and we do not manage ad spend. What we do is the engineering half — technical defects fixed in the code, structured data, the machine-readable layer assistants read, CMS tooling that keeps a content team honest, and the content and translation operation that sits on top.

You cannot buy a place in an assistant's answer, and anyone selling you one is guessing. What you can do is make your business legible to them: a clean machine-readable description of what you do and who you serve, agents.json and llms.txt published at your domain, correct schema on every entity, and content written so a usable answer can be lifted straight from it. Then we ask the assistants what your customers ask and correct what comes back wrong. It is the same discipline as technical SEO, aimed at a reader that is not a person.

No. Anyone who does is either lucky or lying. What we commit to is the work itself: the technical defects fixed, the pages shipped, the schema and machine-readable layer correct, the translations current, the assistant answers tested — and a written account each month of what changed and what we did about it. Where something is outside our influence, we say so instead of charging for it.

Usually not. Most of this can be done on the site you already have, and we would rather fix what is there than sell you a rebuild. It breaks down only when the platform itself cannot emit what search engines and assistants need — per-page metadata, per-language URLs, real structured data, your own files at the domain root. Page-builder platforms hit that wall by design, not by accident. If that is where you are, we will show you exactly which limit you are running into before anyone mentions rebuilding.

Yes. We write real code rather than assembling a vendor's blocks, so we connect to whatever you already run instead of asking you to move into our tool. Where the platform allows the fix, we make it there. Where it does not, we tell you which part of it is the constraint and what it would take to remove it.

Properly, or not at all. Right-to-left is a layout problem before it is a translation problem: mirrored navigation, correct typography, forms and tables that read in the right direction. We treat each language as its own structured content with its own metadata and its own URL so it can rank on its own terms, and we keep it in step with the English as the site changes rather than letting it drift.

You can, and occasionally that is the right call — if you have an in-house team who will act on every line of it. But an audit is a photograph of something that keeps moving: correct on the day it was written, and out of date as soon as competitors publish, the site changes and the results reshape. We would rather find the problems and then be the ones who fix them, month after month, than hand you a document and wish you luck.

The first conversation is free and it is a real conversation, not a pitch. If there is something worth doing, we run a paid discovery: what you rank and get cited for today, where the technical work sits, what your competitors hold that you do not, and what an ongoing operation should actually cover. That produces a written recommendation and a phased quote. The discovery is yours either way — you can take it and walk.